An employee cannot be terminated for engaging in activities
that are protected by public policy.
Such protected activities include refusing to violate a law, engaging in
a legal duty such as jury duty, or exercising a legal or constitutional
right. If an employer fires an employee
for any of these reasons, the employee likely has a case for wrongful
termination.
Recent Case
Recently, former employees of the Sheriff’s
Office in the City of Hampton, Virginia filed a lawsuit alleging
they were wrongfully terminated after exercising their constitutional
rights. The plaintiffs included former
deputy sheriff Daniel Ray Carter, Jr. and his former co-workers. They worked for the office during an election
in which the incumbent sheriff, B.J. Roberts, was running. The employees each “liked” the campaign page
of Sheriff Brown’s election opponent, which angered the sheriff. In a speech to the office, the Brown told his
employees that he knew of their support for his adversary as demonstrated by
their Facebook activity. The Brown also
threatened that, if he were re-elected, any of his opponent’s supporters would
lose their jobs.
Sheriff Brown ultimately won his reelection and subsequently
terminated each of his employees who had “liked” his opponent’s Facebook
page. Carter and his now former
co-workers filed a lawsuit against the Sheriff’s Office, alleging they had been
wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy. Specifically, they alleged they were fired
for exercising their rights of free speech protected by the First Amendment of
the United States Constitution.
The Court Decisions
At the trial level, the court found for the Sheriff’s
Office. The court reasoned that clicking
a single button to “like” a Facebook page was not sufficient activity to
qualify as protected speech. Previous
court decisions had held that expressions on Facebook statuses and the like did
qualify as speech under the First Amendment, however the district court in this
case stated there was a clear distinction between publishing a status message
with words and a single click of a mouse.
The case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit, which overturned the decision of the lower court. The circuit court stated that when a person
“likes” a particular Facebook page, their “like” is communicated to all of
their Facebook connections in several ways through notifications, newsfeeds,
and on their own profile page.
Therefore, the court decided “liking” a political page is akin to
showing support for a campaign in other ways, such as placing a political sign
in your front yard. Therefore, a click
of a mouse to “like” a page could be considered protected political speech
under the First Amendment and would then be wrongful grounds for termination.
No comments:
Post a Comment